← Back to blog

Thirty years and a light rail

Tel Aviv's red line finally opened. The delay lasted longer than some of my readers have been alive. What does a delay that long cost a city — not in money, but in behaviour, in expectation, in how people learn to move?

I remember the first time I heard the light rail was coming. I was eleven years old and my father — a municipal engineer — was reading something in the newspaper at breakfast. "They're finally doing it," he said. I did not ask what. It did not matter. The thing was announced. In Tel Aviv, announced things take a long time.

The red line opened in 2023, after roughly thirty years of planning, halting, replanning, funding disputes, tunneling crises, route changes, and political reversals. I have been watching it for most of my conscious life. I have written about it in the newsletter. Now it is open, and I am trying to understand what the delay actually cost.

The cost you can measure

The measurable cost is large. Billions of shekels in financing charges. Decades of lost productivity from commuters stuck on the Ayalon highway. The environmental cost of those extra car trips. Urban economists have rough methods for estimating all of this, and the numbers are not small.

But I am less interested in the measurable cost. The measurable cost is a number. Numbers are useful for newspaper articles and government reports. They are less useful for understanding what actually happens to a city when its infrastructure is delayed by a generation.

The cost you cannot measure

What you cannot measure is what the delay did to behaviour. Cities are adaptive systems. When a promised infrastructure is delayed long enough, the population stops waiting for it. They build their lives around its absence. They buy cars. They move to suburbs that are car-accessible rather than transit-accessible. They choose jobs within driving distance. They stop expecting the thing to come.

A city that announces infrastructure it cannot deliver is not simply late. It is teaching its residents what to expect from public systems. — from a forthcoming chapter in The Quiet Infrastructure

Tel Aviv is a city of cars in a way that is slightly embarrassing for a place that calls itself progressive. This is partly geography, partly culture, partly the fact that for thirty years the transit alternative was perpetually five years away. The car was not a choice — or rather, it was the only rational choice given what the city was offering. The delay built the car culture as surely as it built the highway system.

What the opening means

The red line is excellent. I have ridden it many times now and I find it genuinely moving — the way good infrastructure is always slightly moving, when you have been waiting for it long enough. It is fast. It is clean. The signage is clear. It connects places that were previously unconnected in a direct way. I watch it from a window sometimes and I feel something close to relief.

But I also watch the people who are not riding it. The car-adapted residents who look at the map, note that the stop is twelve minutes' walk from their apartment, and conclude that the car is still faster door to door. They are not wrong. The light rail will change behaviour over twenty or thirty years, as the city slowly reorganises around the stops. I think about how long that takes and I feel something slightly different from relief.

This is what I am trying to describe in The Quiet Infrastructure: the cost is not just the delay. The cost is the shape of the city that grows in the absence of the promised thing. And the thing, when it finally arrives, has to work against that shape, not with it.

The lesson for other cities

I think often about what other cities can learn from this. Not the lesson that "delays are expensive," which everyone already knows. The deeper lesson: what you do not build changes behaviour as surely as what you build. A city that announces infrastructure and fails to deliver it is running an experiment in learned helplessness. Its residents adapt. They make rational decisions based on what actually exists. And when the infrastructure finally arrives, they look at it with the faint suspicion of people who have been promised things before.

This connects to something I wrote earlier about what I mean by quiet infrastructure: the infrastructure that earns trust by simply working. The light rail is working now. I hope it has thirty years to prove itself. It will need them.